McDaniel v. Gray & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Vendor and Purchaser. Contracts. Action. Title. Before-Judge Fain. Catoosa Superior Court. February Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Crawford, Justice.
Wm. P. McDaniel, agent, etc., bought of C. W. Gray & Co., a vacant lot in the city of Atlanta, for which he paid cash $100.00, and gave his notes payable in four installments, extending over a space of some six months, for the balance, and took a bond for titles.
In that bond was the following clause: “Now if he shall well and truly pay said notes at the times above specified, then the said C. W. Gray & Co. are bound to *435execute to said McDaniel, agent as aforesaid, or assigns, a good and sufficient title to the land aforesaid, but on failure of the said McDaniel, agent as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hudson v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
3Cited by26 opinions
- Couch v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Norris v. LetchworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Crowell v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Schneider v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.