Legal Opinion

Rydberg v. Goodno

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 2004No. A04-1087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Human Services from a judicial appeal panel decision, which granted pass-eligible status to respondent John H. Rydberg, who is subject to an indeterminate commitment as a psychopathic personality. The commissioner contends that the judicial appeal panel erred as a matter of law (1) in requiring the commissioner to show by clear and convincing evidence that Rydberg should not be granted pass-eligible status after Rydberg established a prima facie case for being placed on pass-eligible status; and (2) in granting Rydberg…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hince v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Johnson v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. County of Hennepin v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Piotter v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coker v. LudemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, (A15-1445).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API