Fowler v. Fowler
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
While the parties conceded before the Trial Court that “the law of the state of New York governs these proceedings,” the defendant now asserts that the plaintiff’s case fails for lack of proof of the New York law, since no evidence was introduced with respect to it in the court below. The procedure by which foreign law is to be judicially determined in this jurisdiction was considered in Saloshin v. Houle, 85 N. EL 126, and the principle laid down that in construing foreign law proved in the Trial Court, the appellate court may take judicial notice of that law as contained in “works of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williamson v. ParisienNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Tillman v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Turner v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Insurance v. CarrollSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
- In re Estate of ButtrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- Bisig v. BisigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- JOAN S. v. John S.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.