Harleysville Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Carroll
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Herrmann, J.:
Two questions are presented for decision: (1) Does an “actual controversy” exist such as will support the Court’s jurisdiction to grant a declaratory judgment determining the liability of the plaintiff under an insurance policy issued by it; and if so (2)' is the defendant the “spouse” of the named insured within the coverage of the policy?
The complaint filed by the plaintiff against the defendant alleges the following: On January 2, 1954, the plaintiff issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to Wade Stanley Carroll as the named insured. Under the terms of the policy,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Stabler v. RamsaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lee v. General Acc. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Playtex Family Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989
- Clemente v. Greyhound CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Monsanto Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.