Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1988No. WCB 84-13597; CA A39349; SC S34840PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant’s employer in this case and claimant in Dunn v. SAIF, also decided today, appealed the Workers’ Compensation Board’s dismissal of requests for review of referees’ orders, which each claimed had been timely mailed to the Board in compliance with ORS 656.295(2). That section provides:

“The requests for review shall be mailed to the board and copies of the request shall be mailed to all parties to the proceeding before the referee.”

The Board invoked its rule, OAR 438-05-040(4)(b), which stated that “filing” means

“date of mailing. If the date of mailing is relied upon as the date of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. HumbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Dunn v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dunn v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API