Legal Opinion

Roseburg Forest Products v. Humbert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2007No. H05021; A130216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Roseburg Forest Products (Roseburg), the self-insured employer of respondent Humbert (claimant), seeks judicial review of an order by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (director) barring Roseburg from disputing whether elective surgery recommended by claimant’s attending physician is excessive, inappropriate, or ineffectual. The order was based on an administrative rule under which an insurer or self-insured employer must meet certain time limitations or lose the right to seek the director’s review of the surgery. Roseburg contends that the rule is invalid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roseburg Forest Products v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. ShaddyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API