Legal Opinion

Koski v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The appellant does not stand in the relation of employee to the respondent Montreal Mining Company. The determination of the Industrial Commission that there is an absence of any contract of employment between complainant and the company, either express or implied, is sustained by the evidence as ruled by the circuit court.

The plaintiff, her husband, and their children lived in the house for some sixteen years. The lease contained no provision that the company would keep the house in repair, but the company had a regularly employed crew of painters, who every so often and in rotation painted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hooper v. O. M. Corwin Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Neitzke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rice Lake Golf Club, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Werner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kress Packing Co. v. KottwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API