Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Newland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1905No. 5099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for A lams county, Real, J., entered Eebruary 3, 1904, dismiss ng a proceeding in quo warranto, upon sustaining a demurrer to the petition.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

Appellant brought this action in quo warranto, denying the right of respondent to perform the duties of road supervisor under the act of March 16, 1903 (Laws 1903, p. 223). The lower court sustained a demurrer .to th,e petition, and entered a judgment of dismissal. Petitioner appeals.

The only questions presented relate to the constitutionality of the act above named. Appellant claims that the act is unconstitutional upon four grounds, as follows: (1) It is a delegation of legislative authority to the various boards of county commissioners; (2) it creates an office and provides for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. TroyWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnston v. MeltonWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Egbert v. BlumbergWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API