Royal Ins. Co. v. Wm. Cameron & Co.

HALE, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for the recovery of loss under a policy of insurance on a certain automobile alleging that such loss was caused by theft within the meaning of the policy. The case was tried before the court without a jury and resulted in judgment for appellee. Appellant says the judgment should be reversed and here rendered in its favor because neither the evidence nor the findings of the trial court established a loss covered by the policy.

Subject to certain exclusions, conditions and other terms, the policy sued upon provided coverage in item D-l against “Theft (Broad…