Legal Opinion
Meissner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 19, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GASCOYNE, J.S.C.
The parties agree that there is no dispute as to the facts and that the matter is ripe for disposition as a matter of law by way of cross-motions for summary judgment. On October 6, 1979 the Aetna Casualty and Insurance Company (Aetna) issued a standard family automobile policy covering a 1971 Mercedes *464Benz owned by plaintiff. On July 26,1980, during the period of coverage, plaintiffs 15-year old son took the Mercedes without her permission while she was asleep. The boy did not intend to permanently deprive his mother of her car. During a pursuit by the Town of Dover police,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Baker v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Rudolph v. Home Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Rainville v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaplowitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Chase v. People's Drug StoreSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1989
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- Moolenaar v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996