Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deaton v. Hunt-Elder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1996No. 94-04671, 91-18480, 94-04050; CA A91653Published

1DissentLandau, J.

ORS 656.382(2) provides that attorney fees may be awarded to a claimant when an employer initiates a request for review “and the Administrative Law Judge, board or court finds that the compensation awarded to a claimant should not be disallowed or reduced.” The Supreme Court has construed the statute to apply only when review of the matter actually is exercised and there is a decision on the merits that the award *119of compensation should not be disallowed or reduced. We similarly have held that the statute requires a finding on the merits as a predicate to recovery of attorney fees. That did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SullensOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CurryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Agripac, Inc. v. KitchelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. McKellipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API