Legal Opinion

Haack v. Lindsay Light & Chemical Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1946No. 29034. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This cause is here on leave to appeal granted to review the judgment of the Appellate Court, Second District, reversing in part and affirming in part the decree of the circuit court of Du Page county perpetually enjoining appellant from permitting the escape of gases and other substances from its chemical plant in West Chicago. The decree perpetually enjoined the appellant from, continuing to so operate its business and manufacturing plant that certain gases and fumes therein named are emitted or issued from the building and premises, and enjoining it from continuing, to operate its business…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. People ex rel. Mercer v. Wyanet Electric Light Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. City of Pana v. Central Washed Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. County of Cook v. Midcon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Case Prestressing Corp v. Chicago College of Osteopathic MedicineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. City of Chicago v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Tamalunis v. City of GeorgetownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API