Legal Opinion

Tamalunis v. City of Georgetown

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1989No. 4-88-0677PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McCULLOUGH

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal involves a nuisance action brought by the plaintiffs against the City of Georgetown (City) for the discharge of untreated sewage from a sewer overflow located at Seminary Street in Georgetown into a stream running across plaintiffs’ property. The jury awarded plaintiffs $150,000 in compensatory damages for the nuisance and a permanent injunction was entered against the continued discharge of the sewage. The injunction was stayed pending this appeal.

The City presents six issues for our consideration: (1) whether the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bio-Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. TrainorIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Brown v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bowman v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kazubowski v. KazubowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  2. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. RL Polk and Co. v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Board of Trustees of the Addison Fire Protection District No. 1 Pension Fund v. StampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Rainey v. City of SalemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API