Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Yates

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1905PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court b}r

Beauchamp, J.:

This action was commenced by plaintiff in error against defendants in error in the district court of Logan county.' The allegations of the petition, so far as necessary are: That the plaintiff is the owner of 160 acres of land in Logan county, of the value of $2000; that two tax deeds had been issued against the land by the county treasurer to M. Tates, which were void; that A. G. Jones was a real estate broker and land agent at Guthrie; that plaintiff being desirous of clearing his title to his land and cancelling these tax deeds, and reposing confidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. . HolcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Brown v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Wolf v. WasherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Wills v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Cunningham v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Fender, Adm'r v. SegroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API