Legal Opinion
ASL Associates v. Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 1989No. 7000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dupont, C. J.,
At the joint request of the parties, the trial court granted a motion for reservation1 upon stipulated facts to have this court resolve questions concerning the construction of Article Seven (A) (7) of the regulations of the defendant Marlborough zoning commission. The article requires that a holder of a special permit obtain a building permit and commence construction within nine months of the issuance of the permit or the special permit becomes void.2
The questions reserved to this court are (1) does the pendency of an appeal challenging the validity of a special permit stay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. SanabriaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bass v. ColtelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Esposito v. SpecyalskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bombero v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.