Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Belt

A number of errors have been assigned, but none are relied upon, except those in reference to the giving and refusing instructions.

The evidence relied upon by appellant to show that appellees fraudulently disposed of their property, is that of four acts: First, that Cook’s individual note of $200 was paid with money belonging to the firm; second, that Belt’s note was paid in the same manner; third, that Cook paid the workmen on his dwelling house with the firm’s property; and fourth, that Belt admitted that goods had disappeared from the store while he was absent in Kentucky. As to the last…