Legal Opinion

Weare Commission Co. v. Druley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

On the third day of September, 1890, the Weare Commission Company commenced its suit in assumpsit, by attachment, against William M. Druley and Albert A. Druley. The grounds for the attachment, as stated in the affidavit, were, first, that the defendants had, within two years then last passed, fraudulently conveyed or assigned their effects, or part thereof, so as to hinder and delay their creditors; second, that they had, within two years then last passed, fraudulently concealed or disposed of their property so as to hinder and delay their creditors; and third, that they were about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sims v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Shove v. FarwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
  3. Spencer v. DeagleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  4. First National Bank v. KurtzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  5. James v. BowenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Murry Nelson & Co. v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Curran v. RothschildColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Gamble-Robinson Minot Co. v. MauratisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hafelfinger v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Harris v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API