Legal Opinion

Carbasho v. Musulin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2005No. 32288PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MAYNARD delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Justice STARCHER dissents and reserves the right to file a dissenting opinion.

MAYNARD, Justice.

This case is before this Court upon appeal of a final order of the Circuit Court of Brooke County entered on March 31, 2004. In that order, the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the appellee and defendant below, Michael Musulin, finding that the measure of property damages for the loss of a pet dog is limited to the dog’s fair market value. In this appeal, the appellant and plaintiff below, Helen Tracy Car-basho, contends that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rabideau v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McDonald v. Ohio State University Veterinary HospitalOhio Court of Claims · 1994
  5. Campbell v. ANIMAL QUARANTINE STATION, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Anne Arundel Cty. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. McDougall v. LammSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. SER Justin S. Golden, Sr. v. Hon. Tod J. Kaufman, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API