Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1991No. 120 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object, during closing argument, to the prosecutor’s characterization of appellant as a liar. We find that this claim of ineffectiveness is without merit and, therefore, affirm the order of the Superior Court. 382 Pa.Super. 643, 549 A.2d 1340.

Following a trial by jury, appellant was convicted of rape 1 and criminal conspiracy 2 . Trial counsel filed timely post-verdict motions, however, prior to any ruling thereon, appellant filed a pro se motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API