Legal Opinion

Take v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1931No. 22203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court in mandamus against the district judge of the First judicial district of the state of Oklahoma for the construction and interpretation of the mandate and opinion in cause No. 19468, Louisa Take and William Take, Minors, by A. T. Edmondson, Guardian, Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. T. Powell, Defendant in Error, 138 Okla. 244, 280 Pac. 811, and the mandate in cause No. 19466 in this court, dismissed without opinion.

The proceeding is authorized by the rule announced by this court in St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District Judge, 45 Okla. 423, 146 Pac.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Brictson Mfg. Co. v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. Union Trust Co. v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. In Re BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. In Re Noel's HeirshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Conner v. BattlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API