Legal Opinion

Brictson Mfg. Co. v. Woodrough

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1922No. 227PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, District Judge, refused to comply fully with the mandate of this court issued in Brictson Mfg. Co. v. Close et al., 280 Fed. 297. That was a stockholders’ suit, in which a receiver of all of the corporate assets was appointed, on a complaint in which the relief sought was a dissolution and liquidation of the corporation and its affairs, if a reorganization was not brought about in the meantime; but we held that neither pleadings nor proof brought the controversy within the chancellor’s reach, that the matters complained of could be dealt with only by stockholders and directors…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brictson Mfg. Co. v. CloseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  2. Baltimore Building & Loan Ass'n v. AldersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
  3. Hawes v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Warren v. BunchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York Coalition for Quality Assisted Living, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Whittaker v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Cochrane v. W. F. Potts Son & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API