Legal Opinion

Moore v. McDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1932No. Docket No. 741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This action was instituted by respondent to subject certain property in the city of Bakersfield to a levy of an execution in an action whereby the El Dora Oil Company recovered judgment against Ronald McDonald and three others in the sum of $35,000. Two pieces of property were involved which we will hereafter refer to as the “Hermitage property” and the “Opera Market property”. The trial court held that the Hermitage property belonged to Ronald McDonald and was subject to the lien of the judgment and the levy of the execution, and that the Opera Market property belonged to Jennie McDonald and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Butler v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Perry v. D. J. & T. Sullivan, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Chichester v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API