Legal Opinion

Federal Electric Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 21, 1955No. C. D. 1720PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation referred to in the record as high-tension apparatus or circuit breaker was classified by the collector of customs as laboratory apparatus pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 360 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 360), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (86 Treas. Dec. 337, T. D. 52820), and duty was assessed accordingly at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff, by its protest, makes various claims for lower…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. B. & K. Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API