Legal Opinion

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 17, 1966No. 5177Published

1Opinion of the CourtWoRley, Chief Judge

At issue here is whether the collector properly classified certain air-blast circuit breakers under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, as “switchgear,” assessing duty at 17% per centum ad valorem.

The Customs Court (C.D. 2439) dismissed the importers’ protest that the circuit breakers were dutiable under the broader provisions of the same paragraph of the Tariff Act as “other articles” suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, dutiable at 15 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Federal Electric Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API