Legal Opinion

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1958No. C. D. 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawRencb, Judge:

An importation described in tbe record as voltage regulators was classified by tbe collector of customs as switchgear in paragraph 353 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 353), as modified by tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and duty was imposed thereon at tbe rate of 1T% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiffs claim that tbe devices are not switchgear and should be classified in said paragraph 353, as modified, supra, as “other” articles suitable for controlling electrical energy and dutiable at the rate of 15 per centum ad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Federal Electric Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Brown Boveri Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API