Legal Opinion

Radebaugh v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1925No. 25,168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy presents the- question whether parol evidence was admissible to show an oral contract made contemporaneously with a written contract. The trial court held the evidence was not admissible and rendered judgment for defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

On March 3, 1921, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract wherein the defendant agreed to convey to the plaintiff certain real estate in exchange for a stock of groceries and other merchandise. On March 4 the plaintiff executed to the defendant a bill of sale…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Hudson v. RileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Hazelton v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simonich v. WiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Estate of Boller v. BollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Adams County v. Ritzville State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wheeler, Kelly & Hagny Investment Co. v. CurtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Parker v. MouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API