Radebaugh v. Dillon
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hopkins, J.:
This controversy presents the- question whether parol evidence was admissible to show an oral contract made contemporaneously with a written contract. The trial court held the evidence was not admissible and rendered judgment for defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
On March 3, 1921, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract wherein the defendant agreed to convey to the plaintiff certain real estate in exchange for a stock of groceries and other merchandise. On March 4 the plaintiff executed to the defendant a bill of sale…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Hudson v. RileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Hazelton v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simonich v. WiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Estate of Boller v. BollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Adams County v. Ritzville State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Wheeler, Kelly & Hagny Investment Co. v. CurtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Parker v. MouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.