Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Riley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,901PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In an- action to recover upon a promissory note for $20,000, the jury found for defendants, but the court set aside their findings and verdict and granted a new trial, and from that order defendants appeal.

It is contended that the main ground assigned by the court for granting a new trial was insufficient. In connection with the execution of the note on which a recovery was sought, the following escrow agreement was made:

“This Agreement hereby made and entered into this 7th day of October, 1916, by and between Geo. McGill and Chas. B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Milich v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TruskettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Phelps & Bigelow Windmill Co. v. PiercySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Barbara Oil Co. v. Kansas Gas Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Weiner v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Arensman v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Oliver v. NugenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Custom Built Homes Co. v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API