Hudson v. Riley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
In an- action to recover upon a promissory note for $20,000, the jury found for defendants, but the court set aside their findings and verdict and granted a new trial, and from that order defendants appeal.
It is contended that the main ground assigned by the court for granting a new trial was insufficient. In connection with the execution of the note on which a recovery was sought, the following escrow agreement was made:
“This Agreement hereby made and entered into this 7th day of October, 1916, by and between Geo. McGill and Chas. B.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Milich v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Miller v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TruskettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Phelps & Bigelow Windmill Co. v. PiercySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3Cited by23 opinions
- Barbara Oil Co. v. Kansas Gas Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Weiner v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Arensman v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Oliver v. NugenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Custom Built Homes Co. v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.