Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Shackelford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1947No. A-1116PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slatton

The following certificate is from the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas:

*529“This is a condemnation proceedings in which the City of Dallas is seeking to condemn the whole of a parcel of land (four adjacent lots) owned at the institution of the proceedings by C. M. Shackelford, since deceased, and the suit is now prosecuted by his widow and a daughter. The land is sought to be condemned for use in connection with other property as a municipal public market. The usual proceedings were had and on trial in the county court the case was submitted to a jury on only one issue, that is they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. RubyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of El Paso v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BruggerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. McChristy v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Dallas v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Uehlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Barshop v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Fuller v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API