Legal Opinion
Kleinman v. Steinbach
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 6, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5703PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
This is an interference proceeding which comes before us by appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority to appellee.
The subject matter is described in the decision of the board as "an electric dry shaver having a shaving head including a stationary member and a complementary reciprocating movable member arranged to provide two, or more, separated cutting zones.”
Two counts are involved. They read:
“Count 1. A shaving device comprising a handle and hair shaving means secured to said handle, said hair…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Correge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Edward Fredkin v. Eugene H. IrasekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Simon S. Kahn v. Harvey F. Phipard, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Roy E. Ferree v. Harry D. Shephard, Jr. And Pearl Thelma Griffiths, Administratrix of the Estate of Norman J. GriffithsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967