Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Charles B.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1990No. 88-2163PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Before proceeding to the merits of this appeal, we must first dispose of a procedural issue.

R.C. 3107.06 provides:

“Unless consent is not required under section 3107.07 of the Revised Code, a petition to adopt a minor may be granted only if written consent to the adoption has been executed by all of the following:
“(C) Any person or agency having permanent custody of the minor or authorized by the court to order consent].]”

R.C. 3107.07 provides in pertinent part:

“Consent to adoption is not required of any of the following:

il* * *

“(F) Any * * * lawful custodian of the person to be adopted * * *…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wyss v. WyssOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Portage County Welfare Dept. v. SummersOhio Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. White v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re HitchcockOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API