Legal Opinion
In re Adoption of Charles B.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1990No. 88-2163PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Before proceeding to the merits of this appeal, we must first dispose of a procedural issue.
R.C. 3107.06 provides:
“Unless consent is not required under section 3107.07 of the Revised Code, a petition to adopt a minor may be granted only if written consent to the adoption has been executed by all of the following:
“(C) Any person or agency having permanent custody of the minor or authorized by the court to order consent].]”
R.C. 3107.07 provides in pertinent part:
“Consent to adoption is not required of any of the following:
il* * *
“(F) Any * * * lawful custodian of the person to be adopted * * *…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Wyss v. WyssOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State ex rel. Portage County Welfare Dept. v. SummersOhio Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- White v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re HitchcockOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.