Legal Opinion
In re Bonfield
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 2002No. 2001-0625PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 387.] IN RE BONFIELD. [Cite as In re Bonfield,
2002-Ohio-6660.] Custody—Motion for reconsideration or amendment granted—Pursuant to its authority under R.C. 2151.23(A)(2), a juvenile court may determine whether a shared custody agreement between parties in a same-sex relationship is in the best interest of the children. (No. 2001-0625—Submitted March 13, 2002—Decided December 13, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, Nos. C-000436 and C- 000437. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR AMENDMENT.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- V.C. v. M.J.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- In Re Custody of HSHKWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Masitto v. MasittoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re MullenOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of AdelaideOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Rowell v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Hobbs v. MullenOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.