Legal Opinion

Women of the State v. Gomez

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1995No. CX-94-1442PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we are called upon to assess the validity under the Minnesota Constitution of statutes that restrict the use of public funds for abortion-related medical services to three limited circumstances while permitting the use of such funds for comprehensive childbirth-related medical services. Plaintiffs contend that this selective funding scheme violates a woman’s right to privacy and equal protection of the law because it denies medical benefits to otherwise qualified women solely because they seek to exercise their constitutional right to procreative…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bell v. Low Income Women of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API