Legal Opinion

Leffel v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1976No. Civ. 2635PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

This case presents a question of first impression: Does Penal Code section 647, subdivision (b), which defines “disorderly conduct” as including “[e]very person . . . [w]ho solicits . . . any act of prostitution,” apply to a “customer” of a prostitute, or is the statute limited in its application to solicitation by the prostitute?

Statement of the Case

Appellant was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct in violation of Penal Code section 647, subdivision (b). At the arraignment he demurred to the complaint on the grounds, among others, that the facts alleged failed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Hartway)California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. MeloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Crespin v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Golden State Linen Service, Inc. v. VidalinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API