Legal Opinion

Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 26, 1986No. 3425PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

In this products liability action,1 the defendant appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court following a jury verdict for the plaintiff.2 Certain facts presented to the jury are not disputed by either party. The plaintiff, a fourteen year old girl, was operating a riding lawnmower, which had been sold by the defendant, at the home of relatives when she was injured. She had often operated the lawnmower while staying with her relatives and had been instructed in its use and operation by them. While making a turn on a blacktop driveway, the plaintiff was distracted and drove the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Clark v. Auto Recovery Bureau Conn., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. DeleonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API