Legal Opinion

Lee v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1914No. 5396, 5444PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Garnishment; from city court of Nashville—W. G. Harrison, judge pro hae vice. December 9, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

J. J. Cox obtained judgment against W. E. Lee, who was an heir and distributee of the estate' of M. A. Lee, deceased. Cox sued out garnishment, which was served upon the administrators of M. A. Lee’s estate. In their answer and amended answer the garnishees set up that W. E. Lee was indebted to the estate of M. A. Lee a sum greater than his distributive share of the estate, and that therefore they were not indebted to W. E. Lee, and that they had no property, money, or effects belonging to him. *250The plaintiff in fi. fa. traversed the answer to the garnishment, and upon the trial the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. John Flannery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Owens v. HansenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Brooks v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Jones v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Beeland v. Butler-Payne Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API