Legal Opinion
Stanislaus Lumber Co. v. Pike
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1942No. Civ. 6643PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, Acting P. J.
The plaintiff has appealed from that portion of a judgment which denies the validity of an alleged mechanic’s lien to secure the unpaid portion of a bill for lumber furnished for construction of a dwelling house. It was held that the lien was void for the reason that plaintiff failed to file its claim therefor within the time allowed by the provisions of section 1187 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appeal is presented on the judgment roll only. The evidence is not before us.
The respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice thereof was not filed within the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Johnson v. La GraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- California School Employees Ass'n. v. Governing Board of the Marine Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Howard v. Societa Di Unione E Beneficenza ItalianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Los Angeles City Employees Union v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Coast Central Credit Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.