Legal Opinion

Crowhurst v. Green

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1929No. Docket No. 6913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to require respondents to act upon an annexation petition with a view to determining whether a special election should be called to vote upon the proposition of annexation.

The respondents, by demurrer and answer, have presented but two excuses for their failure to act which require consideration.

First, it is pleaded that another action of the same character is pending. In October, 1928, a similar petition was filed with these respondents, asking them to call a special election for the same purpose. Having refused to act upon the petition a proceeding in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thoits v. ByxbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Jensen v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Carter v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Wilson v. Board of Directors of Veterans' HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Automobile Insurance v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Crowhurst v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API