Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Board of Directors of Veterans' Home

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1902No. S.F. No. 3075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Mandamus. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was admitted to the Veterans’ Home at Tountville in August, 1901, and continued to reside there as a member thereof until October 10, 1901, when he was adjudged to be guilty of violating general order No. 34, promulgated September 15, 1901, prohibiting members of the home from visiting saloons or other places not under the jurisdiction of the home where intoxicating liquors are sold. Plaintiff failed to allege previous demand and refusal to be admitted after his discharge. A general demurrer was interposed, alleging, also, uncertainty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thoits v. ByxbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Metropolis Telephone Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Medina v. Fernós IsernSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  4. Crowhurst v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Medina v. Fernós IsernSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API