Legal Opinion

Hurricane Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 4, 1971No. C.D. 4173Published

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

The involved me rchandise is described on the invoices as partly finished rattan chair frames. Upon importation, they lacked cushions which would enable them to be used. They were exported from Hong Kong and were entered at San Francisco on December 3, 1959 in entry No. 20904 and on February 16, 1960 in entry No. 30400.

*92The merchandise was classified under paragraph 409, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, which reads as follows:

“Furniture wholly or in chief value of rattan, reed, bamboo, osier or willow, malacca, grass, seagrass, or fiber of any kind- 25%% ad val.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Zucca & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. Burstein & Sussman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API