Legal Opinion

Salomon v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 1626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38109.

1Opinion of the CourtBaRbee, Judge

In this case the following stipulation was made and submitted to the Board of General Appraisers at or before the hearing of the protest by that tribunal, and is before us:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the importers and Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the protest above named covers wood pulp—

(A) Produced in and exported directly to the United States from a nation or country with which the United States had at the time of exportation and entry a treaty of amity and commerce containing favored-nation provisions, and that such exportation was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Julius Forstmann & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. H. A. Whitacre, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API