Brown, Eager & Hull Co. v. Mosier
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Garnishment by the Brown, Eager & Hull Company against Carl D. Mosier as garnishee of George P. Wilder, principal defendant. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
The following facts, necessary to understand the question presented in this, case, are taken from the *56findings of facts made by the learned trial judge who heard the case below:
“Prior to January 2, 1914, defendant, George P. Wilder, conducted a variety and bazaar store at Dowagiac, Mich., and on said date was indebted to various merchandise creditors in amounts exceeding $4,370, inclusive of the account of the above-named plaintiff of $602.29, exclusive of interest; that prior to the giving of the mortgage hereinafter mentioned several creditors of principal defendant had signified their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Sheldon v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- McMorran v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Maclaren v. KramarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Hubbard v. McNaughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. Hellner Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re United Fuel & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Anderson v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Sleeper v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.