Legal Opinion

People v. DeCampoamor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*670Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his oral and written statements were properly admitted into evidence. The totality of the circumstances demonstrated that the defendant’s statements were made voluntarily (see People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38 [1977]; People v Gega, 74 AD3d 1229, 1231 [2010]). The defendant appeared of his own volition at a police precinct seeking to file a complaint against a person who, in a televised interview, accused him of committing the murders. He was met by two detectives who asked him if he wanted to accompany them back to police headquarters to speak with the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. SeeberNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. HeideNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. DunbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. CurrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. BondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API