Legal Opinion

People v. Heide

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1994PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed.

A two-pronged showing is required to establish entitlement to a lesser included offense charge. First, it must be shown that the additional offense is a lesser included offense within the meaning of CPL 1.20 (37). Second, the requesting party must show that there is a reasonable view of the evidence in the particular case that would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser included offense, but not the greater (CPL 300.50 [1]; People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 63).

It is undisputed here that criminally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. StanfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. People v. PealerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. MalaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. BajanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API