Legal Opinion
People v. Seeber
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2005PublishedCited by 297 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
County Court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s motion to withdraw her negotiated guilty plea to second-degree felony murder. Nothing in the record of the plea allocution called into question the voluntary, knowing and intelligent nature of defendant’s bargained-for plea (see People v Alexander, 97 NY2d 482, 485 [2002] [“Trial judges are vested with discretion in deciding plea withdrawal motions because they are best able to determine whether a plea is entered voluntarily, knowingly and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by297 opinions
- People v. PelaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. TrombleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.