Legal Opinion

Camden Interstate Ry. Co. v. Broom

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1905No. 1,409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

On December 5, 1902, the plaintiff below, Edward Broom, a boy six years old, was run over by one of the defendant company’s cars, and lost a leg. The accident occurred in the morning, at or near a street crossing in Ironton, Ohio, while the boy, in company with other children, was on his way to school. He brought this suit by his next friend, claiming the company was liable, because the brakes on the car were out of order (one set being off and the other not working properly), so it could not be stopped quick enough to avoid striking him, and because, in view of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Minahan v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  4. Chilton v. Central Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Fleishman v. Neversink Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. GravesTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Townsley v. Yellow Cab Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Union Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. Barstow v. Capital Traction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Force v. Standard Silk Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API