Legal Opinion

Yerkes v. Yerkes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2003No. 151 MAP 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

824 A.2d 1169 (2003)

Lydia A. YERKES, Appellee,

v.

Keith A. YERKES, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted February 26, 2002.

Decided May 30, 2003.

Keith A. Yerkes, for Keith A. Yerkes, pro se.

Albert J. Meier, for Lydia A. Yerkes.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

The question presented in this case is whether incarceration, standing alone, is a "material and substantial change in circumstances" that provides sufficient grounds for modification or termination of a child support order. We hold that it is not.

Appel…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Saylor; Concurrence · Eakin.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API