Legal Opinion

General Motors Co. v. Swan Carburetor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1930No. 5190PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The Swan Company, plaintiff below, was the licensor and the General Motors Company the licensee, in a patent license contract relating to- an automobile intake manifold. To recover royalties thereunder, the Swan Company brought this suit in the state court;, it was removed to the court below, and plainly belonged, as it was considered to be, upon the law side of the court. A jury was waived, in writing; a trial was had, and testimony taken before the court; without any request for findings filed by either party, but in purported compliance with a request by defendant (probably oral), the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Maloney Tank Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. General Motors Corporation v. Swan Carburetor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Dean Rubber Mfg. Co. v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  5. Baldwin Rubber Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API