Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hammel v. Foor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1960No. Docket 61, Calendar 48,241PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill for specific performance of 2 alleged oral contracts. They claimed to be the beneficiaries of an oral contract between Albert Dupraw and Caroline Dupraw, his wife, both deceased, to make mutual and reciprocal wills giving their property to each other and then 1/2 to specified heirs of each. They further claimed as beneficiaries of an oral contract by Albert Dupraw to leave property to the plaintiffs by will in exchange for the personal services of Marion Shaw, one of the plaintiffs.

It is admitted that Albert Dupraw and Caroline Dupraw were husband and wife, that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eicholtz v. GrunewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Keasey v. EnglesMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Applebaum v. WechslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Paris v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Smith v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hergenreder v. Bickford Senior Living Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Huntington National Bank v. Aronoff Living TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API