Legal Opinion
Moleske v. MacDonald
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 13, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The assignments of error all relate to a single question, well stated by counsel for the plaintiff-appellant, as follows: “Whether the statutes impose on the Highway Commissioner the duty of maintain ing sidewalks on trunk line highways lying within highway limits, the neglect to perform which renders him liable in damages.”
For the purposes of this appeal, the conceded facts are, that on October 1st, 1928, about seven o’clock in the evening, the plaintiff, while walking on a sidewalk on the southerly side of Main Street in East Haven, fell and was injured, by reason of the defective and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- McGar v. Borough of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Petraska v. National Acme Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Manchester v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ryszkiewicz v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hay v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Hornyak v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Tuckel v. ArgravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Griffith v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.