Tardiff v. M-A-C Plan of NE
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, C. J.
The sole issue raised by the defendant’s exceptions in this case involves the propriety of a decision by a Justice of the Superior Court, to whom it was submitted on the Agreed Statement of Facts presented here, that:
“the recording of an unsigned copy of a conditional sale agreement is not a recording of the agreement”
within the meaning of R. S., 1944, Chap. 106, Sec. 8. It is stipulated expressly in the Agreed Statement that if the recording disclosed therein “was not valid between the parties” to the action, neither of whom was a party to the instrument, i.e. if the plaintiff was not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Sawyer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836
- Carter v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Shepherd v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maine League Federal Credit Union v. Atlantic MotorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Boscho, Inc. v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Mac Motor Sales, Inc. v. PateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958